Clinical Information

Expand all

Collapse all

Demonstrated efficacy

In clinical trials, overall treatment success required at least a 2–grade improvement from baseline by both investigator and subject assessments

  • Success was defined as post-treatment glabellar line severity of none or mild for the combined investigator and subject assessments (composite assessment) on Day 30 with at least a 2-grade improvement1

  • A subject had to improve from a score of 3 (severe) to a score of 1 or 0 (mild or none), or a score of 2 (moderate) to a score of 0 (none) in order to meet the requirements for overall treatment success

    Study design
    3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical studies evaluated the efficacy of Dysport for use in the temporary improvement of the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines. These 3 studies enrolled healthy adults (ages 19–75) with glabellar lines of at least moderate severity at maximum frown. Subjects were excluded if they had marked ptosis, deep dermal scarring, or a substantial inability to lessen glabellar lines, even by physically spreading them apart. The subjects in these studies received either Dysport or placebo. The total dose was 50 units delivered in equally divided aliquots to specified injection sites.

    Additional endpoints for each of the studies were post-treatment glabellar line severity of none or mild with at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline for separate investigator and subject assessments at Day 30.

  • Studies GL-1 and GL-3 were 6- and 5-month (respectively) single-dose studies comparing Dysport to placebo

  • GL-2 was a study of Dysport vs placebo in subjects who had received up to 4 treatments of Dysport over the course of the study

Close

Demonstrated results

Improvement at every time point1,2
A 5-month, single-dose, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study (N=300) to assess the safety and efficacy of 50 Units of Dysport vs placebo in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown1


*statistically significant


a1+ grade improvement assessed by physicians and patients was a secondary endpoint.
*statistically significant

Improvement demonstrated for up to 4 months1,3
(also see study GL-3 results above)
A 6-month, single-dose, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study (N=158) to assess the safety and efficacy of 50 Units of Dysport vs placebo in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown1


*NS=Not statistically significant


a1+ grade improvement assessed by physicians and patients was a secondary endpoint.
*NS = Not statistically significant

Close

Clinical safety

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
The potency Units of Dysport are specific to the preparation and assay method utilized. They are not interchangeable with other preparations of botulinum toxin products and, therefore, units of biological activity of Dysport cannot be compared to or converted into units of any other botulinum toxin products assessed with any other specific assay method.

CONTRAINDICATIONS  

  • Dysport is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin preparation or to any of the components in the formulation.
  • This product may contain trace amounts of cow’s milk protein. Patients known to be allergic to cow’s milk protein should not be treated with Dysport.
  • Dysport is contraindicated for use in patients with injection at the proposed injection sites(s).

The following table reflects exposure to Dysport in 398 subjects aged 19 to 75 who were evaluated in the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies that assessed the use of Dysport for the temporary improvement in the appearance of glabellar lines. Adverse events of any cause were reported for 48% of the Dysport-treated subjects and 33% of the placebo-treated subjects. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity1.

Please see additional Important Safety Information including Boxed Warning for Dysport below.

References: 1. Dysport [package insert]. Scottsdale, AZ. Medicis Aesthetics, Inc.; May 2009. 2. Data on file. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, CSR Y-97-52120-718. Draft 4.0. June 2007. 3. Data on file. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, CSR Y-97-52120-719. Draft 5.0. June 2007.

Close


 
 
 

The information in this section of DysportUSA.com is intended for healthcare professionals only. If you are a healthcare professional, please verify by clicking the button below.

I am a healthcare proffesional

If you are not a healthcare professional, we invite you to learn about Dysport by going here.

The product information provided on this site is intended only for healthcare professionals licensed in the United States.